« Blog Biology…Linking up the Food Chain? | Main | Changed my Feed to FeedBurner »

August 10, 2005

SOA Architects’ Forum – An Interesting Question

Last Wednesday, I had the opportunity to attend Cape Clear’s SOA Architects’ Forum in the Boston area. While it was my intent to write about the forum last week, a question posed by an attendee at the end of the day propelled me down a research rat hole from which I’ve yet to fully emerge. The question, innocent enough, was “Where do service definition activities fit into mainstream development methodologies, such as RUP?”

From my own experience, service definition activities span business modeling, analysis and design. You find a service (and the need for it) during business modeling. You define and refine the service during analysis. You further refine and provision the service during design.

I think there is general agreement on the above – perhaps not in “how”, but definitely in “what”. Cape Clear certainly made their perspective known early in the forum, with a slide that said “Model the business, not the technology”. (Yes!)

However, the larger question – the how – and the fit of service practices and related artifacts in industry accepted methodologies – is still open. Certainly, methodologists, consultants and vendors are all (independently) circling the question, with MDA, UML 2.0, SOAD, SOMA and SOBA.   

But, I have yet to find (and welcome references to) a publicly available, cohesive, services-oriented modeling/analysis and design methodology. I should note, I am eagerly awaiting the release of Thomas Erl’s second SOA book, to dig into his chapters on service-oriented analysis and design.   

I suppose it is too early for fully formed methodologies to appear. After all, the best methodologies -- those that apply the right amount of methodology to accomplish a task, no more, no less -- evolve over time, through real-world practice.

But, it’s not too early to be thinking about unifying service-oriented architecture practices, and even, to start doing something about it. If you know of, or are interested in, such an effort let me know.

In the meantime, I’ll continue my research, and report back my findings.

Oh, I really will post about Cape Clear’s SOA Architect Forum; it was good, well worth the time. 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c2a6553ef00d834524af353ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference SOA Architects’ Forum – An Interesting Question:

Comments

"But, it’s not too early to be thinking about unifying service-oriented architecture practices, and even, to start doing something about it. If you know of, or are interested in, such an effort let me know."

I'm writing a SOA methodology book: "12 Steps to SOA." It's based on this paper.

http://www.webservices.org/index.php/ws/content/view/full/44718

FYI

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

About | Contact

Ads

Subscribe



  • Powered by FeedBlitz


Ads 2

Search

  • Google

    WWW
    blog.elementallinks.com

Affiliate

Accountability

  • The ideas and opinions expressed in this blog are my own.

License

blogosphere



Blog powered by TypePad